Subject	AWD or Front ?
Posted by	DC on February 02, 2004 at 10:17 PM
	This message has been viewed 51 times.
In Reply To	1990 2+2 NA Vs Plymouth Laser Turbo??? posted by Calvinkleins23 on February 02, 2004 at 10:09 PM
Message	Front wheel drive would be easy, 195 Hp going to the Front wheels with turbo lag and that great Lazer reputation for quality. AWD would be hard from a launch but easier from a roll, 5 more hp but 10% more drivetrain loss. Im speaking of stock VS stock, mods to an na Z wont do what theyll do for a turbo Dsm, even somting named a Lazer.
Follow Ups	1990 2+2 NA Vs Plymouth Laser Turbo??? - Calvinkleins23 22:09:58 02/02/04 AWD or Front ? - DC 22:17:33 02/02/04 Oh and by the way - DC 22:20:16 02/02/04 Re: AWD or Front ? - yawgm0thzx 22:22:03 02/02/04 thats good to know, thanks (n/m) - DC 22:26:26 02/02/04 Re: Re: AWD or Front ? - Calvinkleins23 22:30:03 02/02/04 They made some AWD... - 300zxdream 22:47:29 02/02/04 Most were FWD, but they did offer AWD Lasers as well. (n/m) - boileralum 23:20:05 02/02/04 street racing is bad, take it to the track... - Red ZX (Sr. N00b) 22:17:47 02/02/04 4.6.... 205hp i believe... laser turbo hard to tell!!! - tylerr 00:13:04 02/03/04 90 lasers were FWD ONLY. And the laser will beat you with so - cafenated 01:28:01 02/04/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.